[
reply ]
lyricserver sent a message with the title:
Touché Mr. Assman. Touché. and received
0 replies.
message sent on data:
26/September/2005 15:21:58
John, as to properly identify you, let me first and foremost apologize (to a certain extent) regaring my reply. I, too, am suprized at my "unbelieveably verbose, yet quite eloquent reply." My english professor would have been proud, however its true meaning was a relaxed form of sarcasm. After all, the difference in the construction of your other replies in comparasin to your reply of MY message are quite different. I had written a reply to a person whom I didn't know and based that person's qualities and personality (a common action taken by people while conversing on the internet) only on the information available to me at the time. Thus it is in this very instance that submit my apology to you concerning this matter and ask to withdraw my comment about there being a decimal point in your IQ score, for now I know it is truly at the end of the third digit, not in front.
Thank you for the kind words regarding my language, but it is indeed a necessity for my profession. Currently I am studying to become a translator (translator, mind you, not an interpreter) between the Engligh and Spanish languages. As such is my case it is mandatory to become proficient in one langage over the other and in such case, I had chosen English.
And so now I wish to address your questions. The first question you had asked me was "[D]id you steal quotes from others after initiating a google search in order to formulate your reply?" The clear, concise answer is no. Nor did I consult dictionary.com, thesaurus.com or any website or book reagarding definition or meaning of words to construct my reply. It was written entirely in my own words, as is this reply. I do not believe in plagerism, and appropriately give credit to words which are no my own by using quotation marks, as all of your words are contained, sepataring them from mine.
The second question (without contest the most important) is "[W]hat is the sexual appeal of a foot?" For this you accused me of not answering ditectly and avoiding the question when, at second glance, I did so, but in a manner that was quite vague. Once again I apologize for the circmstance, but I did answer your question initially. This time I will (attempt to) take a more direct approach.
To start, let me ask this rhetorical question: What is sexual appeal of a woman's ass? It serves no function in the procreative form of sexual intercourse other than to cushion the female while underneath the male in the act. It does not smell sexually pleasing or stimulating for that matter. Just thinking about licking a woman's A-hole is quite repulsive to people in general, for there being still some remaining fecal matter in the orifice. Now, that being said, is the ass still sexy? Most definately, but all these negativities toward the ass can lead a person to say "No." Now lets take these arguments and apply them to the foot. "What is the sexual appeal of a woman's foot? It serves no funtion in sexual intercourse at all, nor does it propigate, stimulate, coherse, or accelerate the act of sex at all, in fact it is totally removed from the subject.
Yet how can ass be sexy and not the foot? The most common answer is simply: No one knows. No one knows why you like the ass over a leg, why I like boobs over ass and why others like feet over boobs and ass. we just do. There is no explanation unless its hidden in the genetic code of our DNA, but even then that's postulating. However common that may be, it is not the only answer. I know for a fact that it has to do with culture. Many cultures regard the women as sacred beings and to willingly touch them (whether it be on the arm or the back of the hand) was an act of sacrilege. Yes people died because they touched the hair of a female. Only women were allowed to touch other women. but from those cultures came about the superstition of the woman's foot. From what I hear, the woman's foot is very sacred. I've met a woman who would not ever let me see her bare feet. only if they were covered with socks was I allowed in her presence, just in case I saw her naked foot. Granted, I thought that was weird, but different people have different customs. and with this goes the honoring of the foot.
But there goes another theory: If you can't see it, it makes you want it more. take for example, the ass. Usually the ass is covered by not only underwear, but also by some pants, a skirt or dress, overalls, you get the picture. but when you see the real thing, it's just fantastic. Same goes with the boobs or pussy. For women it's the dick. For some it is the foot, although unusual, it does happen.
To summarize there are a lot of ideas why, but at the end of the day all that can be said is "I don't know. go ask them". I like feet collages to show the difference in size. That's what gets me. Others look at a foot like a piece of ass and feel that way. Why? I don't know.
I hope this answers your question (finally) and thank you for your time. I must be off now.
-lyricserver
